Summary
20150001 The complainant requested that a judge’s behavior be reviewed for dishonesty after becoming publicly known that he had unpaid rent from when he was previously living in Quebec.
20150002 A complainant recommended that a judge’s conduct be reviewed following a ceremony where comments about the complainant were considered to be disparaging and libelous.
20150005 The complainants stated that the judge had repeatedly made negative comments that were based on personal political opinions.
20150006 The source of this complaint was based on the alleged lack of response from the Council in regards to numerous letters the Council received from the complainant.
20150008 The complainant accused a judge of colluding with court staff and the defendants when deciding to dismiss the case.
20150009 In a court dispute over the estate of a parent, the complainant wrote to the Council because he felt the delay between the end of the hearing and the release of the decision was unreasonable.
20150010 This complaint is based on a newspaper article regarding a judge’s decision.
20150011 The complainant, a contracted nurse, was put on a calling list after failing a probationary period in a new position at a hospital.
20150012 This complainant was an American citizen whose company shared business in Quebec.
20150015 In a family court matter involving the custody of a child, a judge became the source of various complaints.
20150017 The complainant stated that two judges showed bias and discrimination towards his mental health disability as they did not grant him special access or accommodations.
20150018 In a family court matter regarding spousal support and matrimonial property separation, the judge was accused of ridiculing and verbally abusing the complainant as well as being biased.
20150019 The complainant alleged that the judge involved in this case lacked communication skills, was biased, ordered for injustice against the complainant and managed the hearing poorly
20150020 This complaint was regarding a judge’s appointment as Chancellor of a University.
20150021 The complainant felt that the audio recording of their testimony seemed to be severed in parts and that a judge lied about the complainant’s comments.
20150022 The complainant felt that the judge involved in this case was biased and acted as a lawyer because the opposing counsel was not prepared.
20150023 The complainant provided multiple correspondence letters to the Council with allegations that the judges involved in his case lacked integrity and impartiality.
20150024 This complaint stemmed from a high conflict family law matter which includes allegations of bullying, intimidation, abuse, racism, corruption, collusion, bias, cover up, fabrication, disregard of the rule of law and of civil, human and Charter rights.
20150025 This complaint is in reference to previously submitted complaints regarding multiple judges and their inability to make proper judicial decisions.
20150026 This complaint arose from a family law matter regarding the placement of a child.
20150027 In a family matters case, the complainant had previously submitted a multitude of complaints, all of which were dismissed by the Council.
20150028 This complaint is regarding a family law matter involving the placement of a child.
20150029 The complaint concerns the actions of a judge, who at the time was a lawyer, and the alleged willful endangerment of children.
20150030 This complaint is against a deputy judge in a small claims court.
20150032 The complainant felt that the judge involved in this case was unorganized, disrespectful, distracting, and in violation of their rights.
20150034 In this case, a lawyer complained that his client had experienced a six month delay for the disposition of a contempt order against judgement debtors in a small claims court action, which he deemed unreasonable and unacceptable.
20150035 The complainant accused a judge of making several errors in their decision regarding the complainant’s application for leave to appeal.
20150036 The Council received a complaint from an individual indicating that they wanted justice against a judge from the Superior Court of Quebec.
20150037 The complaint received by Council included two grievances.
20150038 The complainant requested that an investigation be made regarding a judge based on allegations of bias and libel.
20150040 The complainant holds a federal licence to possess and use medical marijuana to treat the symptoms of his asthma following an incident from 2012.
20150041 The Council received a complaint regarding a judge where the complainant alleged that the judge failed to meet the level of understanding of the English language required to provide a fair hearing in summary judgment proceedings in 2012.
20150042 The correspondence received explained that two judges had allegedly filed complaints against the complainant, who worked as a Registrar in the Family Law Division of a courthouse.
20150043 The complainant alleged that three lawyers involved in his case had agreed on a settlement without his approval and that the judge did not take any action against the lawyers for that.
20150044 The complainant believed that the judge involved in his case was prejudiced, negative, biased, and disregarding to him because he is a farmer.
20150045 The source of this complaint is based on the alleged aggressive, racist, demeaning, unfair and abusive nature of the judge involved.
20150046 The complainant indicated that they did not want their previous file closed, and asked that an inquiry be conducted into their complaint against the judge involved.
20150047 In a high conflict family law court case where custody and access to the children were the main issues, the complainant found the judge to be biased, erroneous and in breach of the complainant’s rights.
20150049 In a lengthy family law case, the complainant stated that the during the multiple hearings with the same judge, the judge failed to review court records, made numerous errors and presided over the hearings in an insufficient way.
20150050 The complainant in this case indicated that the judge was pressuring and badgering him to hurry with his submissions so that the trial could conclude early, and made him feel like he was a nuisance.
20150052 In correspondence sent to Council, the complainant alleged that the judges, the law professionals and the authorities working on a family matters trial were conniving together and trying to sway the outcome of the case through fraudulent actions.
20150054 The complainants claimed that after they filed a Notice of Application and a response to a bank, they did not receive any response submissions within the timeline provided by the Rules of the Court.
20150055 In a high conflict family court matter, the complainant wrote to the Council expressing that during two hearings regarding the custody of her daughter, the judge treated her as though she was not a real person with any rights or entitlements.
20150056 In correspondence to the Council, the complainant expressed that she was dissatisfied with the judge’s decisions in her court matter and asked the Council for help in stopping an order.
20150057 The complainant stated that although the lawyers for the defence had brought about many delays, the conduct of the judge had created a tedious and painfully drawn out atmosphere in the courtroom.
20150058 In a high conflict family court matter, the complainant wrote to the Council expressing that during the proceedings, the judge allegedly implied that the complainant ran an abusive household, spoke badly of his ex-spouse in front of their son, was a liar, and a deadbeat father.
20150059 The complainant claimed that the judge’s ruling was unfair and that it did not reflect the true situation in which the complainant found himself.
20150060 The Council received letters from a complainant requesting that a decision from the Council regarding a previous complaint be reconsidered.
20150061 The complainant expressed that a judge was unable to manage her case and that the courts had made a mess of her estate matter.
20150063 In this family matters case, the complainant stated that the judge’s decision showed little thought or insight, and was rendered seven months after the hearing.
20150064 The complainant alleged that the judge treated him inappropriately, with disrespect, in an un dignified and humiliating manner, and also discriminated against him on the basis of race and disability.
20150065 The complainant believed that the judge did not provide a fair trial, and that he was unable to file an application for a mistrial on the basis of ineffective counsel, due to his counsel being prevented by the judge from helping him.
20150066 The complainant in this case claims damages against a number of individuals and corporations for allegedly wilfully and intentionally colluding, and damaging his right to a peaceful life.
20150067 This complainant had requested multiple times that the Council investigate the ethical conduct of a judge of the Superior Court of Justice.
20150068 The complainant had written to the Council requesting assistance in obtaining the required materials for his appeal, including the Reasons for Judgement, transcripts of his hearing, and wished to receive help to file such materials with the Court of Appeal.
20150069 The complainants in this case allege that a judge committed a series of inappropriate actions including negligence, bias, obstruction of justice and breaches to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
20150070 In an anonymous correspondence to Council, the complaint alleged that the judge’s online publications before being appointed created an unprecedented appearance of bias that was harmful to the Supreme Court of Canada as an institution due to blatant partisanship.
20150071 A complainant alleged that a judge had conducted a case conference in an ill manner and that the judge made certain orders, granted certain relief and made assumptions and findings, all of which were improper in the context of the conference.
20150072 In several emails to the Council, the complainant alleged that the judge did not take any action upon learning that the three lawyers in the case had presented a settlement to the Court even though the complainant had not agreed to it.
20150073 In a settlement conference, the complainants alleged that the judge was in a conflict of interest, insisted he would hear the settlement conference notwithstanding the complainants’ objection, and made various inappropriate comments.
20150074 The complainant, a lawyer, represented a couple during a trial where the judge allegedly dismissed the plaintiff’s claim in its entirety in her judgment.
20150075 In correspondence to the Council, the complainant alleged that the judge in a family case conference was very abrupt, did not have the courtesy of letting her approach the bench or speak with him officially, which she felt was demeaning.
20150076 The source of this complaint is a request for a judge to resign from his position.
20150077 The complainant alleged that the judge turned down the information he wanted to file in court on the basis that he had never responded to a motion presented by the counsel for the defendant, which the complainant denied; and refused to let him appeal without his permission, which the complainant said he never received.
20150078 In a family court trial, the complainant stated that the judge was negligent and rendered the same judgement repeatedly in the matter that concerns her, despite the judgement being unenforceable.
20150079 A series of correspondence letters regarding this complaint were received by Council.
20150081 The complainant has written several times in the past with similar allegations.
20150083 The complainant requested access to and full disclosure of the Council’s investigation regarding her complaint against a judge, including the report by outside counsel.
20150084 The complainant wrote to the Council after his claims from a motor vehicle accident were dismissed.
20150085 A complainant, a recently disbarred lawyer, requested that the Council do something to prevent judges from suspending a lawyer unreasonably because, as the complainant put it, “they defer to the wishes of our Law Society”.
20150086 The complaint received by the Council included two grievances.
20150087 The complainant alleged that he was not provided enough time to respond to an order from the court.
20150089 The Council received a complaint regarding a judge’s improper dismissal of a complaint for judicial misconduct.
20150090 The complainant expressed that prior to a judge’s appointment to the Bench, she abused her power to help breakdown her sister’s marriage and alienate the child of that marriage from his father.
20150091 Following a family matters trial, the complainant expressed concern over the conduct of the judge during a hearing that concerned his fiancée, her child and the child’s father.
20150092 The complainant claimed that the judge’s decision in a very public case involving a city and a private company was a result of bribery.
20150093 In a Tax Court of Canada hearing, the complainant alleged that the judge consistently interrupted the complainant to make counter arguments, stated that though the complainant was right it wasn’t going to help his case, and did not allow the opportunity to present any evidence.
20150094 In a family matters case regarding the custody of a child, the complainant alleged that the judge seemed to show a lack of integrity and good judgment, to be biased against all women in custody matters, that he was neglectful and that his conduct was reprehensible, underhanded and unbefitting of a judge.
20150095 During a proceeding regarding landlords and housing, the complainant felt that the judge breached her privacy by mentioning a previous case that concerned her even though it had no bearing on the current case as they involve different landlords and, as a result, she felt that it made her look bad in front of her current landlord.
20150098 A complaint regarding a judge from the Court of Appeal suggested that the information that was included in the final judgement was incorrect.
20150099 The complainant alleged that a judge from the Superior Court personally and professionally libelled and defamed the complainant in certain paragraphs of a Costs Endorsement.
20150101 A complaint about 7 judges alleges that their ruling in the matter that concerned the complainant’s son were based on criminal acts by the opposing parties’ counsel, and that the judges ignored all references to those crimes.
20150102 The complainant alleged that the judgment on a motion for costs in a civil lawsuit and the judge’s oral reasons that were reported in the media made a mockery of the Criminal Code and that it condoned and monetized violence against women.
20150103 In a family court matter regarding custody of the complainant’s son, a judge heard an emergency ex parte motion (an emergency motion without notice to the other party) brought by the son’s mother.
20150104 The complainant alleged that a judge engaged in misconduct or illegal action in an appeal to a Divisional Court regarding the legal status of a Consulting company and their representatives.
20150105 The complainant alleged that a judge had failed to enforce his decision in a timely manner and brought the appearance of administration of justice into disrepute.
20150107 In this correspondence to Council, the complainant alleged that two judges had an affair while they were both practising law in the same firm, and that once one of the judges was appointed, he then appointed the other judge.
20150108 During a family trial matter regarding ownership of property, a complainant alleged that she was harassed, threatened, slandered, defamed, and treated unfairly during her trial in 2009.
20150109 The complainant, a lawyer in this case, alleged that the comments made by the judge were “extreme” after the judge became aware that the complainant had only served his documents to the opposing party, but had neglected to serve the documents to the opposing party’s lawyer.
20150110 The correspondence received by the Council was from a complainant who indicated that he was upset with the way the judge handled his trial regarding his father’s death.
20150112 The complainant shared his concern that some documents related to his court matter were illegally censored by government employees prior to the judge deciding on the matter.
20150113 The complainant, an inmate, alleged that a judge refused to hear his Preliminary Motion for a Habeas Corpus Order and that his application was not heard in a timely matter.
20150114 During a family trial matter regarding the complainant’s property, the complainant expressed that as a result of a conflict with her brother, she was going to lose her land and house.
20150115 The complainant alleges that the judge had no jurisdiction to take over and combine the Power of Attorney application and the divorce proceedings that involved her.
20150116 In a letter to the Council, the complainant alleged that twenty-seven months had passed since a judge ordered his ex-partner to pay the complainant his share of their house because he had moved out.
20150117 The complainant alleged that there was a conflict of interest in regards to everyone involved in his case, including judges, starting from the moment he had been charged.
20150119 In a letter to the Council, a complainant alleged that he was denied accommodation, and therefore discriminated against, by different judges because they dismissed his case.
20150120 The complainant requested that a decision from the Council regarding a previous complaint be reconsidered.
20150121 The complainant responded to a letter that she had previously received from the Council.
20150122 A letter was received from a complainant requesting that a decision from the Council regarding a previous complaint be reconsidered.
20150125 The complainant alleged that a judge punished him for following the Rules of Civil Procedure and that, in doing so, aided the defendants.
20150126 The complainant alleged that the judges involved in her trial should be penalised for their actions and corruptness in breaking the law, and that she was in disagreement with some of the decisions made by the judges in her family matter.
20150127 The complainant wrote to the Council to claim that the judges in her case participated in the use of false affidavits and unjustified access to personal information from 2002 to 2011, including access to personal health records, which adversely affected her estates matter.
20150129 The complainant requested that a judge’s conduct be reviewed as the judge seemed inexperienced, allegedly did not properly assess evidence and ignored some of the evidence in his estate matter.
20150130 This complaint was addressed and closed previously in the year.
20150131 In a difficult family law matter, the complainant requested corrective action to mitigate the alleged damage caused by a judge.